Статья посвящена правовому обеспечению института защиты прав человека в России и вопросам функционирования правоохранительной системы.
| The Social Sciences | ||||||
| Year: 2016 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 787-792 | ||||||
| DOI: 10.3923/sscience.2016.787.792 | ||||||
| Man Observance of His Rights in Russia | ||||||
| Victor Yu. Melnikov , Y.A. Kolesnikov , A.V. Kiseleva , N.V. Dzhagaryan and S.M. Lyakh | ||||||
|
Abstract: Ensuring the rights of participants in criminal proceedings must meet the ideas of man and his rights and liberties as the supreme value and comply with the international standards of human rights which are an integral part of the Russian legal system. The Russian Constitution recognizes human rights and liberties of the supreme value and their respect for and protection-state is responsibility. Establishment of the institute of human rights fulfill its purpose of criminal proceedings currently pending and continues its search for the real development. Norms concerning human rights remained unsecured due to extremely inconsistent, unsystematic and fragmented regulatory procedures for implementation of these declared rights. The idea of a priority in the criminal proceedings to protect from crime, the rights and legitimate interests of man, society and the state to protect individuals from illegal and unwarranted accusation, limitation of rights and freedoms as a basis for the concept of criminal procedural law. In addition to the disclosure of crimes and exposure of persons who have committed them for which functioning law enforcement system and reformed the current criminal procedure law, the purpose of criminal proceedings lies in the creation of a proper mechanism of legal security, the implementation and protection of the rights and freedoms of participants in criminal proceedings. Improving the efficiency of the legal regulation of the protection of human rights and freedoms in criminal proceedings needs to be improved, first of all in pre-trial proceedings, the application of coercive procedural measures.
|
||||||
|
||||||